SKS-FILES FORUM

SKS Carbines => Unaltered SKS Rifles => Russian SKS => Topic started by: Justin Hell on December 06, 2020, 11:45:32 AM

Title: 49/50/56 serial strangeness
Post by: Justin Hell on December 06, 2020, 11:45:32 AM
Recently I bought an early Russian bolt/carrier combo for a project bubba, I was told it came from a 50....
I just found these for sale today....
The 49 cover in there has the same prefix letters as my bolt combo....only 1000ish later. It doesn't appear to be scrubbed to me....your thoughts are welcomed though. :)


(https://i.ibb.co/rkG3bVc/3covers-top.jpg) (https://ibb.co/Zd6SH0Y)


(https://i.ibb.co/D8c4m5N/3covers-back.jpg) (https://ibb.co/b2w1Yzx)

I checked the serial database, and only one SKS comes up with these prefixes.... a 1956 with the suffix character.
Is it possible that they started reusing the prefixes and that is why the suffix was added?
I can easily see an early cover being used on a 50, and that's how I ended up with a 49 or 50 setup, but it doesn't make sense to leap all the way to 56.

Found it interesting...and started up my speculatin' again. :)
Title: Re: 49/50/56 serial strangeness
Post by: Bob_The_Student on December 06, 2020, 12:01:52 PM
I like your theory, Justin.
Title: Re: 49/50/56 serial strangeness
Post by: running-man on December 06, 2020, 01:12:53 PM
The ‘49 S/N at the very least is not original to that receiver cover. Wrong format, should be a one liner.

In all the examples I’ve ever seen, I’ve never seen a credible ‘49 with a two line receiver cover.  Some say they exist and we can’t be sure when the transition happened, but again I’ve seen zero evidence of it.

The other two, who knows. This is why we only verify prefixes from as-issued guns or when a definitive prefix has been found from a min of 4 guns with identical years & characteristics.  My best guess is that the ‘50 is correct. That reverse r was used extensively as a second prefix letter early on and then disappeared by ‘51 or ‘52.
Title: Re: 49/50/56 serial strangeness
Post by: pcke2000 on December 06, 2020, 02:16:04 PM
I saw that listing too when I tried to find another 1948 or earlier receiver cover.
Title: Re: 49/50/56 serial strangeness
Post by: pcke2000 on December 06, 2020, 02:30:43 PM
I think the top of the 1949 cover was scrubbed.